Artinian bimodule with quasi-Frobenius bimodule of translations
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The higher relation bimodule
Given a finite dimensional algebra A of finite global dimension, we consider the trivial extension of A by the A − A-bimodule ⊕i≥2 Ext 2 A(DA,A), which we call the higher relation bimodule. We first give a recipe allowing to construct the quiver of this trivial extension in case A is a string algebra and then apply it to prove that, if A is gentle, then the tensor algebra of the higher relation...
متن کاملEquivariant Maps and Bimodule Projections
We construct a counterexample to Solel’s[25] conjecture that the range of any contractive, idempotent, MASA bimodule map on B(H) is necessarily a ternary subalgebra. Our construction reduces this problem to an analogous problem about the ranges of idempotent maps that are equivariant with respect to a group action. Such maps are important to understand Hamana’s theory of G-injective operator sp...
متن کاملA Structure Theorem for Quasi-hopf Bimodule Coalgebras
Let H be a quasi-Hopf algebra. We show that any H-bimodule coalgebra C for which there exists an H-bimodule coalgebra morphism ν : C → H is isomorphic to what we will call a smash product coalgebra. To this end, we use an explicit monoidal equivalence between the category of two-sided two-cosided Hopf modules over H and the category of left Yetter-Drinfeld modules over H. This categorical metho...
متن کاملInjectivity of the Predual Bimodule
Let A be a dual Banach algebra with predual A∗ and consider the following assertions: (A) A is Connes-amenable; (B) A has a normal, virtual diagonal; (C) A∗ is an injective A-bimodule. For general A, all that is known is that (B) implies (A) whereas, for von Neumann algebras, (A), (B), and (C) are equivalent. We show that (C) always implies (B) whereas the converse is false for A = M(G) where G...
متن کاملRep#1: Deformations of a bimodule algebra
Definition 3. Let B be a ring. Then, we denote by B [[t]] the ring of formal power series over B in the indeterminate t, where t is supposed to commute with every element of B. Formally, this means that we define B [[t]] as the ring of all sequences (b0, b1, b2, ...) ∈ BN (where N means the set {0, 1, 2, ...}), with addition defined by (b0, b1, b2, ...) + (b ′ 0, b ′ 1, b ′ 2, ...) = (b0 + b ′ ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Discrete Mathematics and Applications
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0924-9265,1569-3929
DOI: 10.1515/dma-2019-0010